Report on the
9th Australian Golden Olive Awards –
Table Olives 2008
by Professor Stan Kailis - School of
Plant Biology - The University of Western
Australia
Professor Kailis thanks the
olive growers/processors for submitting table olive products for evaluation.
Participation in such a competition ensures that quality table olive products
are available to consumers.
• Gold
-
4
• Silver
-
11
• Bronze
-
9
• No award
- 4
• Result pending - 1
All products were scored out
of 20 and awards made on the basis of -
Gold
17 to 20
Silver
15 to less than 17
Bronze
13 to less than 15
No award
less than 13
Gold medals were awarded to
four products. The increased number of awards in this competition compared to
previous years, is a possible indication of the improved quality of the table
olive products submitted.
Products submitted included
back table olives, green and turning colour olives, flavoured olives, tapenades
and some innovative products. The latter include olive jerky and olive dukah.
Most products submitted, on
the basis of their organoleptic qualities, were considered to be suitable for
commercial sale. However, all table olive products should be cleared for safety
by an accredited laboratory, before selling to third parties. Both olives and
brines were evaluated from the submitted table olive products. The results for
one product are pending microbiological clearance. This product had high oil
content and fresh garlic, a combination that can possibly increase the risk of
botulism to consumers. Except for immediate use only food grade dried herbs and
spices should be used in olive products.
Microbiological Analysis of
Olives
Professor Kailis recommends,
for future Golden Table Olive Competitions, that entrants submit at least 3
representative samples of their products for testing to Australian standards by
a recognised laboratory. The following suite of tests would ensure a high degree
of microbiological safety and good manufacturing
practice.
Unpasteurised products - E. coli, yeast and mould tests - test for safety and
contamination
Pasteurised products - Lactobacillus counts - test for effective
pasteurisation method.
All products in brine and combinations - pH, acid level and salt levels of packing
solution - IOC standards and labelling.
Unpasteurised salt/heat dried olives and
tapenades - salt levels -
IOC standard and labelling.
Other tests may be warranted
- where products have excessive handling eg stuffing olives by hand, cheese
additions
Table olive processors and
packers should work towards proposed international standards (IOC) for table
olive packing solutions as indicated in Table 1.
Table 1. Extract of IOC proposed
standard for table olive packing solutions
(2004)
|
Process |
Minimum
Brine Salt
Levels (as
%w/v) |
Maximum
Brine
pH |
Minimum
Acidity
as % lactic
acid
|
|
Naturally Processed
|
6
|
4.3 |
0.3 |
|
Lye
Treated
Olives
|
5 |
4.0 |
0.5 |
Note: When table olive
products are pasteurised or sterilised, adherence to the above levels is not
required. The amounts of salt and acid present are then governed by Good
Manufacturing Practice and consumer preference.
Sensory Evaluation of Table Olive
Products
All table olive products
submitted for judging were evaluated against the criteria in Table 2. These
criteria have been developed so as to be consistent with international testing
procedures. Both positive and negative attributes were evaluated.
Table 2. Criteria for the sensory
evaluation of table olives.
|
|
|
Negative
Attributes |
Positive
Attributes |
|
Brine
|
Appearance |
Cloudy/unpleasant
Foreign
matter |
Clear/pleasant
Good
colour |
|
Aroma |
Unpleasant/none
Excessive
Acid/Winey/Vinegary |
Very
strong
Pleasant |
|
Fruit |
Appearance |
Badly blemished
skin
Irregular
shape
Irregular
size
Skin colour
variable
Colour intensity
unappealing |
Unblemished
Uniform
shape
Uniform
size
Homogenous
Colour
appealing |
|
Aroma |
Unpleasant/none |
Fruity-spicy
very
strong |
|
Touch |
Very squashy/too
hard |
Firm |
|
Skin &
Fruit |
Hard/tough
(biting)
Soft/woody/fibrous
(biting) |
Skin hardness
acceptable
Crisp |
|
Flesh &
stone |
Detachment
difficult
Pit/flesh ratio
poor |
Easily
detached
Pit/flesh ratio very
good |
|
Taste |
Bland/
unpleasant
Excessive
acid/vinegar
Too bitter/too
sweet
Too
salty |
Fruity/spicy
Pleasant
acid/vinegar
Good level
bitter/sweet
Good level of
salt |
Brines: Sensory evaluation of packing brines is generally not
undertaken in table olive competitions. The rationale for their inclusion in
this competition is consistent with proposed requirements of the International
Olive Council. Here packing brine should be clean and free from unauthorised
foreign matter but can include spices, aromatic herbs and olive oil. Both
appearance and aroma of packing brines were evaluated. Attention was directed to
the clarity of packing brines, where there were no additions such as herbs and
spices. As the appearance of olives and brine are important to consumers, olives
packed in brines containing original natural pigments as well as fruit and
fermentation aromas was considered particularly desirable compared to insipid
brines for this class. With green table olives, fruitiness was considered
important. No rancidity was detected in the brines. Brines were scored low if
they had an excessive acid/vinegar aroma.
Olives: Generally olives were of good appearance and colour and
reasonably firm and crisp. In scoring, emphasis was placed on the taste and
texture of the olives. Colour, size and size variability were also important
attributes that contributed positively to the assessment
score.
Note: Table olives should be
balanced with respect to saltiness, fruitiness and bitterness. The latter
flavours, when weak, were often difficult to detect at higher salt levels.
Acid/winey is considered an important positive attribute, but where
overpowering, such as the addition of too much vinegar when packing, becomes a
negative attribute. Most of the table olives submitted showed few skin defects
eg holes, pressure marks, wrinkles, sloughing or blistering.
Most of the flavoured olives
submitted were weak in flavour with respect to the additions. Processors/packers
need to be more adventurous in formulating their flavoured
products.
Comments for individual
products are given in the results section.
Sensory Evaluation of
Tapenade
The criteria in Table 3 were
used to evaluate the submitted tapenade samples. For clarification, tapenade is
an olive paste that can contain ground olive flesh, garlic, anchovy, capers and
other flavourings (herbs, spices, vinegar, lemon etc).
The tapenades assessed had a
pleasant appearance, although one had large chunks of unground olive flesh.
Rancidity was not a major problem the samples although one sample had obvious
mould growth on the surface. In the latter, this could indicate insufficient
salt, no pasteurisation or inadequate
pasteurisation
Comments for individual
products are given in the latter section of the results
table.
Table 3. Criteria for the sensory
evaluation of tapenade preparations
|
|
|
Negative
Attributes |
Positive
Attributes |
|
Tapenade |
Appearance |
Very
lumpy
Colour
unappealing
Colour
variable |
Slightly
course
Colour
appealing
Homogenous |
|
|
Aroma |
Unpleasant/none/rancid |
Very strong
fruity |
|
Texture |
Very squashy/too
firm
Mouth feel
unpleasant |
Firm
Mouth feel
pleasant |
|
Taste |
Bland/unpleasant
Excessive
acid/winey/vinegar
Too
bitter
Too
salty |
Fruity
Pleasant
acid/winey/vinegar
Good level of
bitterness
Good level of
salt |
Note:
1. Too much anchovy can
overpower the taste of the tapenade particularly if the olives used lack
flavour. The texture of tapenade should be firm, not too stiff or too runny.
Here the quantity of olive oil needs to be adjusted. Overall tapenades should be
balanced with respect to fruitiness, acid/winey and bitterness. Care must be
taken to not add excessive amounts of anchovy, vinegar or lemon juice. Otherwise
the olive fruity taste is overpowered.
2. As this type of product
has a tendency to go rancid when exposed to air, quality table olives must be
used and added olive oil should be of high quality. Poor quality table olives
and rancid olive oil will give a poor product.
Professor Kailis wishes to
thank Laurel Nowacki and the Golden Globe Awards committee for providing
logistics for the competition.
Professor Stan
Kailis
31/08/08